Podobná online videa

Komentáře & Download

1998disco72 - 17.3.2013 8:24:13
In my opinion when the POTUS King Obama sent the bust of Churchill in my opinion was a slap in the face to the UK.

1998disco72 - 17.3.2013 8:22:47
Well, History is repeating itself now with the Middle East Iran and Syria and the US. Obama is arming several middle eastern countries but the media its like nothing to see here!

1998disco72 - 17.3.2013 8:19:33
Yeah, they are still a bit pissed off about that.

1998disco72 - 17.3.2013 8:14:39
Oh my let us not offend the French!! Please.

Lucy Gellhorn - 14.3.2013 22:34:55
Thanks this video really helped with my test revision!

retrokidm1 - 19.2.2013 6:40:10
My point is that Chamberlain's pursuit for peace seems like a bunch of bullshit, you don't stop a wrong doing by pacification, The British are not daft, ww1 was still fresh in people's mind, to stop any tyrannical regime to come into power you must kill the tyrant, the Germans had the reichmar republic a stable democracy but the pivotal point was the Reichstag fire which brought the enabling act

retrokidm1 - 19.2.2013 6:28:12
(Con't) there are a lot lingering issues that are still in the air, like the Hess controversy concerning the anglo-Saxon treaty, the fact that the 3rd reich were infiltrated in by mi6 (look up agent knopf), does anyone believe the fact that giving the Sudetenland to Germany would stop German aggression ?

retrokidm1 - 19.2.2013 6:07:07
My opinion is the Munich Agreement was a laugh, Neville Chamberlain gave Czechslovakia to Germany on a Silver platter,the German and British relationship has me skeptical, Duke of Windsor King Edward was a Nazi a known nazi supporter

Tomáš Pecák - 22.1.2013 3:06:14
Dude, Germans would have crushed us in case of war... after Austria joined the reich we would be fucked... we had very good military at the time, however, there was almost no line of defence between Czechoslovakia and Austria, and also germans had way stronger airforce I think, They would reduce Prague into cinders...

barocco78 - 28.12.2012 7:18:16
What the British always needed was a little adjustment. In 1588, the 30,000 soldiers of the Spanish tercios under Farnese were the right medicine (the landing of 1595 showed that), but the naval incompetence and an opportune storm saved the English asses. It is an arrogance of people that in time of trouble always had a luxury to hide on their island. All imperial pretense aside, they never could lead Europe, for in heart there is more of a shopkeeper in a Brit than a lion. 

FIVEOFEVER - 25.12.2012 6:02:51
Actually didn't Roosevelt have a hand in that at the Yalta Conference? He used to refer to Stalin as "Uncle Joe".

Torgo1969 - 25.12.2012 5:55:18
I can only speak for myself, but I am a huge fan of British comedy & literature. Having said that, I loathe Britain's rulers for giving false hope to Poland in 1939 by promising to defend Polish territorial integrity then selling them down the river to Stalin's Bolshevik scum. I praise the British (and the Germans & all of Europe) for bringing an enlightened future of science to other peoples of the world, but Perfidious Albion did spread war in blessed Europe, for which they stand condemned.

FIVEOFEVER - 25.12.2012 3:35:56
I've always been told that Poland has no love for the UK. Is that true?

Torgo1969 - 23.12.2012 18:08:11
So giving self-determination to Germans is "appeasement"? The more I read of the rotten character & Germanophobia of men like Chamberlain & Churchill, the more I realize that the wrong side won WW2, but at least Churchill lived to hate himself & regret his fanatical unconstrained vision of destroying Germany. This Pole would gladly piss on his grave for what he did to stab Poland in the back at the end of WW2, & it's long past time we considered him as an appeaser like Chamberlain is called.

poligon333 - 5.12.2012 2:06:31
It worked out well then , did it ?

poligon333 - 5.12.2012 1:55:30
If Hitler would listen to his generals , Britain would be in his hands in matter of days so desperate the situation was. It was lucky that he got dumb.

poligon333 - 5.12.2012 1:51:45
I couldn't say it better.

poligon333 - 5.12.2012 1:49:36
Neville Chamberlain made deals with Hitler (coward). Churchill made deals with Stalin (coward and hypocrite).

neil73 - 19.10.2012 22:58:12
What did Neville Chamberlain say whilst sat on the toilet? 'I have in my hand a piece of paper'

DIDI GIGI - 28.9.2012 22:26:17
Wonder if Obama is watching this/

MrLasicak - 2.8.2012 4:51:28
against Hitler in case of war against Czechoslovakia. Munich was a turning point. The moment, when France lost its allies in central Europe (Czechoslovakia, Romania with its oil fields, Yugoslavia), SSSR was turned on its way of cooperation with Nazis and Hitler started his one by one tactis. It was a complete disaster. In paradoxical climax, it was German 7th Panzer division armed with czech tanks what drived that oppereta result of what you call rearnament into waters of chanell in Dunquerke.

MrLasicak - 2.8.2012 4:37:09
Sorry man, you are completly wrong. There was no reason for what you call rearnament.(funny thing is, that GB in 1940 wasnt able to put in field at least what Czechoslovakia could in 1938) There was literally no German plane, unit, ship, which could even reach British coast in 1938. In fact it was Nevilles policy what brought German military at coast of channel. There was strong inside opposition in Germany, general von Kleist WAS IN No 10 Downing street, met Halifax and inform him about plot

Ariel Barton - 21.7.2012 15:16:34
7:09 for the speech

Ariel Barton - 21.7.2012 14:54:26
7:09